Skepticism and moral responsibility

Skepticism about moral responsibility is one of the most elaborated approaches to this important phenomenon in contemporary philosophical literature. In paper, I use skeptical approach general, and specific arguments particular, clarify connections between conditions an appropriate attribution re­sponsibility structural elements attitude. A distinction made dogmatism a critical morality, classification given possible outcomes latter: skepticism proper, illusionism, revolutionary ap­proach. The difference general defined, types respon­sibility proposed on basis which structure are questioned. Galen Strawson’s Basic argument, Gideon Rosen’s argument from epistemological regress, his alethic conception ana­lyzed. It shown that unreasonably reduces so-called true responsibility. argued epistemic condition responsi­bility regress directed can be reduced normative con­dition, thus avoided. connection retri­bution, Rosen postulates, problematized. control binds agent agent’s factor; factor its value. value cannot object